Community
Grayson County Rejects UTV Use on County Roads After Lake-Area Concerns
Grayson County Fiscal Court voted 5-1 against a proposal that would have allowed UTVs and ATVs on county roads, with magistrates citing safety concerns and opposition they had heard from residents, including people around the lake.
Updated September 25, 2026
Today at Rough River
TARR-created graphic.
Editorial standards
Grayson County’s discussion over whether to allow UTVs and ATVs on county roads ended with a clear vote this month.
At the September 10 Grayson County Fiscal Court meeting, magistrates voted 5-1 against moving forward with the proposal. For now, UTVs and ATVs remain unauthorized for general travel on Grayson County roads.
The discussion is particularly relevant around Rough River because magistrates said some of the strongest opposition they had heard came from people around the lake.
The Proposal Had Been Under Review Since July
Fiscal Court had been discussing the possibility of allowing UTVs and ATVs on county roads since an earlier meeting.
Before the September vote, county officials said they had asked magistrates to talk with constituents and gather more information, including safety concerns and how a county ordinance might work alongside rules inside the City of Leitchfield.
The court also discussed the difficulty of creating one set of rules for county roads while nearby cities could have different requirements.
Lake-Area Residents Were Specifically Mentioned
During the September discussion, multiple magistrates said they had heard more opposition than support for the change.
One magistrate specifically said the opposition he had heard was “especially around the lake.” Another agreed that the response from constituents had leaned against allowing the vehicles on county roads.
Safety was a major part of the discussion.
Magistrates pointed to the difference between lower-speed city streets and county roads where speed limits can reach 55 mph, and raised concerns about serious crashes involving UTVs or ATVs.
The meeting also noted that agricultural use is treated differently under existing law and that some farm-related travel is already permitted under certain circumstances.
Fiscal Court Voted 5-1 Against the Proposal
Rather than continue revising the idea or direct the county attorney to prepare an ordinance, magistrates decided to put the question to a vote.
The proposal failed 5-1.
That means Grayson County did not adopt a new ordinance allowing general UTV or ATV travel on county roads.
Nothing in the September 10 vote changes the separate rules that may apply to lawful agricultural use, private property or other uses already allowed under state law.
What This Means for Rough River Residents
For residents and visitors on the Grayson County side of Rough River Lake, the practical result is straightforward: Fiscal Court did not open county roads to general UTV/ATV travel.
That is particularly notable because lake-area feedback became part of the court’s discussion before the vote.
The issue could be raised again in the future, but the September vote did not create a temporary pilot program or send a revised ordinance forward. The proposal before Fiscal Court was rejected.
TARR will continue following county decisions that affect transportation, road access and recreation around Rough River Lake.
Sources
Go to the record

